Elections and Debates: A Good Idea and a Little Levity

Bookmark and Share

Christian HineAbout a month ago I commented on a desire to see the primary elections changed into a point total contest where each voter was allowed to vote for their top three candidates.  Points would be assigned based on the ranking of candidates a particular voter chooses.  For example, a first place vote would generate three points, second place two, and third place one.  The points would be added and the victor declared. 

It is my feeling that the results of such a contest would yield a much more accurate portrayal of the views of the voters while eliminating the oft heard self defeating argument “I’d vote for him, but he won’t win”.  This way, you could actually vote for your favorite candidate, while assuaging your guilt by voting for your buddy’s favorite as well.  There would be no excuse for not voting the way you really feel.

Doing so would also eliminate the costly and troublesome necessity for runoff elections because there would be a clear winner.  A tie would be broken by whoever received the most first place votes, if still tie, the most second place votes, etc.  It also eliminates the possibility of plurality victories in instances where there is no runoff under law.  In my opinion plurality victories are too amenable to a rather disenfranchised electorate.

I received some positive comments on that proposal and decided to be a little bolder in another idea for confronting both voter apathy and ignorance.  The idea struck me after Governor Huckabee requested that Senator Thompson’s request for a debate in a Lincoln-Douglas style be accepted.

Why stop with just one debate?  Why just two candidates? 

Ladies and gentlemen, I bring to you...  (Drum roll please)

American Ideals

No, not American Idol, the Fox TV favorite.  American Ideals, the first ever televised and real time bracket driven Lincoln-Douglas debates decided immediately by the American people, with single elimination.

Allow me to back up for a moment.  It is sad that we live in a day and age where what Brittany Spears looked like last night generates more press coverage and internet hits than the newest Clinton scandal involving Chinese money laundering and Norman Hsu.  This is the American Idol generation, after all.  It’s flash, flare, drama, and popularity contests that grab the attention of the American people, so let’s cater a little bit to the fanfare requirements of the average US citizen and create a little bit of excitement for real politics at the same time.  Maybe someone will actually learn something in the process.

We start by setting up the top eight candidates into two four candidate brackets.  For the sake of argument, let’s say we seed the candidates according to current polls.  We’d have Guiliani, Thompson, Romney, McCain, Huckabee, Tancredo, Hunter, Paul.  (Ok, I put Paul in instead of Brownback because, lets face it, they’re polling about the same and I didn’t want to hear from all the whiny Paul supporters for leaving him out…and besides, I need an even number.)

Our first rounds would be Guiliani vs. Paul and Thompson vs. Hunter in bracket A, Romney vs. Tancredo and McCain vs. Huckabee in bracket B.  The winners of each contest would face the other winner from their bracket, and then each of the bracket champions would face each other in the final round.

So, we advertise it.  We hype it up.  We make it the biggest deal ever on American Television!  Each of the seven contests would be an hour long episode in which the candidates engage in a real debate.  Something of substance for a change!  And sure, we’d throw in the obligatory just for fun final 10 minutes.  I mean, it can’t be all serious or no one would tune in.  We could have the candidates show off a talent, maybe fight with those cool pugil sticks from American Gladiators.  I don’t know; something that makes must see TV.

At the conclusion of each episode, we have the Fox phone lines on standby for audience voting.  The winner is announced the following episode.

Now, obviously a lot of the details still need to be worked out.  This wouldn’t count as the actual election, but something needs to be offered to encourage participation.  Perhaps with all the advertising money coming in, the winning candidate could receive a million dollars for their campaign. (To hell with campaign finance reform!)

I’d love to see some of the different match-ups created here.  Maybe the brackets could just be randomly generated.  Maybe we could mix the Democrat and Republican candidates and create a larger bracket.  I’m just having fun brainstorming. 

More discourse is sorely needed in American Politics.  I’m willing to go as far fetched as possible to help that happen.

    

11 Responses to “Elections and Debates: A Good Idea and a Little Levity”

  1. D.Roman on September 11th, 2007 at 3:23 am

    Wow, that was interesting.

  2. Christian on September 11th, 2007 at 2:50 pm

    Only from the mind of Christian…
    Interesting good, interesting bad, or interesting “you’re a complete nutter”? :)

  3. OneMom on September 12th, 2007 at 11:35 am

    Cool idea. It would at least make for some very interesting news discussions. Thompson will of course need the questions ahead of time, along with Hunter’s responses ahead of time so that his writers can get his script worked out for him.

  4. Christian on September 12th, 2007 at 3:54 pm

    Thanks. I mean, why not? Are our politicians just so boring and scripted that they don’t dare confront eachother in an open debate? Is it really all about who raises the most money to buy votes and forget about communicating with the American people? Sad. In this system, every candidate gets an equal shot, and because you can only vote for one candidate at a time in each contest, the results would be genuine because if your first choice in candidate isn’t participating, you can still vote for who you really think won each debate without feeling like you are “dissing” your candidate.
    I second your thoughts on Thompson. One word sums up his candidacy….”yawn”.

  5. D. Roman on September 12th, 2007 at 10:03 pm

    A good wow, as in it just might work:-)

  6. Christian on September 12th, 2007 at 11:00 pm

    Cool, I figured. :)
    Now, call Fox and the Huckabee campaign and let’s get this going. :-)

  7. D. Roman on September 14th, 2007 at 1:13 am

    No problem.

  8. D. Roman on September 15th, 2007 at 7:58 pm

    I contacted Fox per your request.

  9. Christian on September 15th, 2007 at 11:49 pm

    Wow. Thanks. I said it kind of sarcastically, but hey, while far fetched, it would be an amazing first for American television. Thanks for taking up the cause. Let me know if you get a response! I mean, obviously I will have royalties to collect! :-)
    Seriously, thanks. The media needs to know that the people demand real discourse. This farce journalism must come to an end.
    Cheers,
    Christian

Leave a Reply

Contributors

  • Christian Hine
  • Archive

    Recent Comments

    Videos

    Ronald Reagan’s 1981 Inaugural Address


    Custom Search